Greetings from the Northwest!

Well, the calendar says it’s Fall and I’m seeing some signs that it’s true with some colorful trees, greener lawns, cool morning mists, and an occasional rain drop. If you don’t live in the Pacific Northwest, you might be surprised by how dry it gets here in the late summer. The lawns are a dull yellow and the evergreens sag like they’re begging for help. The shorter days and dewy mornings bring some relief, and then the rains arrive to finish the job. I know many of you share with me the sentiment that Fall is your favorite season. I’m not quite sure why it’s better than spring, but it is. Maybe it’s the anticipation of the Holidays or the excuse to cuddle up with a hot drink that’s missing in the spring. 

This will be a momentous fall season, with a high-stakes election and global unrest like we’ve not seen in a long time. We’ll watch with interest, but as we’ve said before, we don’t try to predict these outcomes or try to outsmart the hedge fund crowd by placing bets on such things. We have our data-driven process, and it will guide us through whatever these times present. 

Speaking of data, you may have heard the witty and insightful quote attributed to Mark Twain, that “there are 3 kinds of lies: lies, damn lies, and statistics.” Sometimes analysts are looking for an answer and they find it; other times they don’t understand the nature of the data and present “findings” that are flawed. These are mistakes that we work hard not to make. In his part, Patrick will point out a situation or two where the answer being presented by the financial media may be the result of poor use of the available data.

On the home front, we have committed to a new lease for our Vancouver Headquarters, and with it comes a refresh of the office space and furnishings. We’re not quite sure of the timing, but it should be in the early winter. While the construction is active, we’ll be working much more out of the office than in and won’t be having onsite meetings until it is completed. We’re very excited for this next step in our evolution, and I hope that many of you will be able to come in and see the results next year.

One last thing before I hand it over. I have heard time and again how much you appreciate having a live person picking up the phone, and how having our Cairn staff available to answer your questions is so unusual and helpful. We are committed to continuing this level of service, as it’s something that you deserve, and is increasingly rare nowadays. We’re here to help you to navigate life’s financial dilemmas, so please, call and ask to speak with any of our advisors when you’re looking for a little help. It’ll cost you nothing and you won’t be disappointed.
​
With that, on to Patrick:

The third quarter continued to see strong returns across capital markets, as both stock and bond prices were supported by the belief that monetary policy was going to shift to be more accommodative. US stocks, measured by the S&P 500, returned 5.89%, and bonds returned 5.20%. International stocks had a nice tailwind during the quarter with the US Dollar weakening, returning 7.26%. Unlike the first half of the year, equity performance was quite broad, which is the one silver lining despite record high equity valuations.

Last quarter, I did a deep dive into valuations across the broad market and different asset classes so I won’t spend too much time on the topic today besides saying that valuations remain extremely elevated.

The biggest event of the quarter was the change of monetary policy in the US, with the Fed cutting interest rates for the first time since 2020, on September 18th. The media and market participants immediately cheered the Fed’s new policy stance, citing instances of previous interest rate cuts and subsequent market returns. As you know by now, we spend countless hours looking at data, and with any major shift in market behavior it’s useful to look underneath the hood instead of relying on the media’s constant cheerleading. Below is a table of previous interest rate cut cycles and subsequent one year returns for stocks. I’ve also included starting valuations when the Fed embarked on a rate cut cycle.

When pundits and media personalities site the average return of stocks being strong after the Fed embarks on an interest rate cut cycle, they are not wrong, but looking at the data more closely paints a different picture. The starting level of valuation was a big driver of whether stocks did well or not after a shift in monetary policy. We do not know for certain what the next year brings, but we can say that outside of 2001, the S&P 500 has never been more expensive to start a rate cut cycle.
​
With all the talk about equity market performance after the Fed’s policy change, the reaction in the bond market was equally interesting. Intuitively, one would think that interest rates across all maturities of US treasuries would drop after an interest rate cut. The chart below shows how interest rates have moved since September 17th.

As you can see in the bottom part of the chart, short maturity treasury bonds did see a drop in interest rates following the Fed’s 0.50% interest rate cut. But when you look at the longer maturity bonds, interest rates increased in response to looser monetary policy. This seems to indicate that the bond market is not convinced the fight against inflation is finished, and looser monetary policy could reignite inflationary forces. The chart below shows the maturity schedule of the over $19 trillion in US government debt. Between 2025-2027 there is over $7 trillion maturing that will need to be refinanced. Suffice it to say, the US government does not want to see longer dated US treasury bond rates moving higher with the interest expense on US debt taking up over 30% of tax receipts 2023. I would imagine that number will increase when it is reported for 2024.

Longer maturity treasuries yields are sensitive to inflation and growth expectations in the economy. Currently, the data is still mixed on both fronts, with headline inflation numbers showing improvement, but survey inflation metrics and expectations still elevated. Economic activity data has started to show some weakness, so time will tell if a clear trend in either direction materializes.
​
Portfolio positioning has not shifted drastically over the last few months because opportunities are still scarce. We are still holding high levels of cash in money markets, as we view risks to be quite elevated and interest rates on cash are sufficient while we wait for a better risk / reward environment. When there have been opportunities to put some cash to work, we have taken advantage of them. We will let the data guide us on when a larger shift in portfolio allocation is warranted, but in the meantime, we still view risk management as being the largest priority, considering high valuations and euphoric sentiment.

We thank you for your continued trust and welcome any questions or comments you have on the economy, markets, or your portfolio. —Patrick Mason

Greetings from the Northwest!

July is upon us, and the forecast here is for some very Summery days ahead with temps in the mid-nineties. With that, we’re coming into what has traditionally been a slower season for security markets and many businesses, with folks nationwide taking advantage of the good weather to travel or enjoy their homes and families. At Cairn, the incoming calls have dropped off quite a bit, and are most likely to be about pulling a little cash for home improvements or travel. As usual, we’re cycling through a few staff vacations here, but will always have someone available to take your call and move funds or make a trade if the markets and banks are open.

Despite the predictable lull in business activity, this year has some underlying circumstances that make it unique and interesting. For one, it’s an election year. I hardly go for an hour without someone pointing this out. With each passing week the intensity of the media storm on this topic is increasing, with no respite likely until late in the year. Many people worry about the possible election outcomes and how their lives, finances, investments and the future health of the nation could be affected. Our job is to see to it that no matter what happens in November, our clients’ investments survive the experience, and, if possible, thrive. On our side is the fact that election years tend to be good for the stock market; this is not intuitive, but historically the markets have advanced, regardless of who wins. Since 1960, only 3 of 16 elections have coincided with a down market.
​
We’ve also got a bit of a tailwind with our positions in fixed income and cash, both of which are paying much higher rates than just a couple of years ago; and the fixed income is better positioned to act in its traditional role as a counterbalance to stocks and is less subject to interest rate shocks going forward.

Every year, and every election year, is different, and many other realities are in play. Inflation has subsided but is not yet back where the Fed, and most of us, want it to be; mortgage rates are high relative to the past decade or so, and with house prices as high as they are, this has put the market for existing homes in quite a bind. People simply cannot afford to buy an equivalent house if they choose to sell the one that they’re in. This chart (below) illustrates the difference between the average rate of existing mortgages (loans outstanding) and the current rates. This has resulted in fewer existing homes for sale and has greatly benefited new home builders, who can offer homes at just the right price point, along with preferential financing.

A possible longer-term outcome will be a sideways or down market for several years as folks just stay put, and when they do move, they can afford less of a home.

Other things in play include massive public debt at much higher interest costs, a thinly supported stock market and generally high valuations. On the bright side, people seem to be going about their lives and spending money, and the US economy still shines above all others.

One last thing before I hand this to Patrick for an in-depth discussion: Please remember that we have your back when it comes to financial planning of pretty much any sort, with broad expertise, multiple certifications, and best in class tools; we can work with you, at no additional cost, to develop and implement a plan for your future needs. Contact anyone at Cairn to get started.

Equity markets had a mixed 2nd quarter as US stocks continue to be led by just a few select large technology companies. The table below summarizes the returns of the major indices for the quarter.

As you can observe from the table above, outside of the S&P 500 and Nasdaq, most major indices were negative, which might not be intuitive given the media’s regular mentioning that stocks are hitting all-time highs. The previous few quarters, I have written about inflation, Fed rate cut decisions, investor sentiment, and equity valuations. I am not going to touch on the economic backdrop, which remains mixed, but focus this letter solely on what is driving equity market returns, what that could mean moving forward, and how we are navigating this challenging environment. As we go through the charts below, the major takeaway will be waning market participation (breadth) being masked by a few large tech companies despite lofty or extreme valuations.

The chart above takes the equal weight version of the S&P 500 and divides that into the traditional (market cap weighted) version of the S&P 500. When the line is moving down, fewer stocks are driving the returns of the S&P 500 which is generally not a healthy market environment. Historically, sustained bull markets are accompanied by broad participation across sectors and asset classes. The current level of this ratio is at a 16-year low, and as you can also see from the chart, prolonged downturns in this ratio have preceded some nasty bear markets in the past in 2000, 2007 and 2020.

As the market continues to make new highs, fewer companies are trading above their respective 200 day moving averages, which signals more companies’ prices are entering a downtrend than an uptrend. As we have witnessed in other reflection points in the market.

With the tech sector growing to over 30% of the S&P 500’s weighting, similar to 1999, it is even more glaring when you compare the price performance of the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index versus the S&P 500 Information Technology Sector Index.

Year-to-date performance of the different S&P 500 sectors confirms that most sectors are showing mid-single digit gains.
​
The same can be said when looking at asset class performance.

Investors piling into mutual funds or passive ETFs that follow or overweight these popular sectors are taking on much more risk than they probably realize. I think of it as momentum chasing with little regard to the price being paid for the underlying fundamentals.
​
Recently in the Wall Street Journal, a chief investment officer of a well-known brokerage firm was quoted as saying, “Tech allows you to play defense and offense at the same time.” I find this difficult to believe. Tech has a trailing p/e ratio of 43x, a forward p/e of 34x, a combined price to sales ratio of over 13x, and we are late in a cycle with euphoria at very high levels for that given sector.

Valuations in the US are also reaching extremes when you compare them to the rest of the world. The chart above shows the S&P 500 price / sales ratio divided into the rest of the world’s price / sales ratio. There have only been a few times over the last 27 years when we have reached this level of relative overvaluation. 

Equity market returns have been largely positive this year and over the last twelve months; but the outsized returns that are being shown in select indices are being driven by just a handful of names that are trading at historically high valuations. We feel this brings a high amount of risk to chasing those names as well as to the broader market. Speculators seem to believe that no price is too high and that they will be able to time the exit from the party before everyone else rushes for the door. This is almost impossible to accomplish on a consistent basis. As investors, we believe in understanding the price we are paying for the underlying fundamentals of the business and asset class, then paying a price we believe is below the value of what the market is offering it for. This does two things: It provides more downside protection than buying overpriced assets if the market falters, or we end up being wrong (which happens occasionally), and it produces a long-term return sufficient to meet your goals. Ignoring the noise and focusing on process is essential for navigating expensive equity markets. Currently, we are still invested below our long-term equity targets across all asset allocation strategies. We are still finding some limited opportunities, but the data guides us to still have a higher-than-normal cash balance. When the facts change, rest assured, we will change our mind and will have the flexibility to deploy cash without having to sell other assets that have declined in value.
​
Thank you again for your continued support and trust. I intend my section of the newsletter to be informative and to give you a glimpse into what we are looking at daily. Please feel free to reach out to me if you want to discuss any topic in more detail. —Patrick Mason

Thanks, Patrick! As always, a well thought out analysis of some important factors affecting our markets.

I hope everyone has a safe and fun summer. If you’d like to come in to review your accounts or your long-term plans, please give Stefanie a call, and she’ll get you scheduled with your advisor.
​
​Tim Mosier, President
​Cairn Investment Group, Inc.

Greetings from the Northwest!

Well, it’s been quite a first quarter for 2024! Against a backdrop of multi-faceted turmoil, the US economy has been strong enough to avoid a recession, despite last year’s spike in interest rates and enduring inflation. Apparently, consumers are still spending, even if it means getting deeper into debt, which may indicate a sense of optimism about their prospects, or it could be a house of cards ready to fall. We’ll see. Stock market indexes outperformed most expectations, but still, we saw that the broader market was not as enthusiastic as the few market leaders, although this last month saw that broader market catch up a bit; a healthy move. The “Magnificent Seven” is now the “Fab Four,” with Apple and Tesla in particular underperforming of late. 

A much-desired outcome for the Fed and most investors is the elusive “soft landing” whereby a major economic shift occurs (in this case, raising the Fed rates), without driving the economy into recession. I think it’s arguable that they’ve achieved that goal, recognizing that we never actually land anywhere; the merry-go-round never stops, and someday, due to some set of circumstances, we will experience a recession. Inflation is not yet in the bag either. We can’t yet predict the combined effect of having the Suez Canal route compromised and the upper Chesapeake out of service at the same time.

I’ve heard it argued that we’ve been experiencing a “rolling” recession, with economic sectors taking their turn getting hit, then recovering, with the net result that overall, we never dip below the line. I can believe that. 

We’ve moved past the bank scare we were talking about last year at this time, but it may not all be over, especially for regional banks that have lent heavily into the commercial real estate market. I probably don’t have to tell you much about the state of that market for you to understand the risk presented. We have little to no exposure there, so hopefully whatever transpires won’t spread much beyond that sector. 
​
We’re happy to welcome Spring, and with the better weather, more of you are wanting to come in for an in-person meeting! I highly encourage it. Just give us a week or two’s notice and we can be prepared.

Before moving on to Patrick’s well thought out dissection of the financial world, I’ll mention that we now have the ability to actively manage your 401(k)s and similar assets that cannot be brought into Schwab at this time. We’re utilizing a software service by Pontera that allows us access to almost any employer retirement plan. The advantages to you are our ability to coordinate those investments with your overall strategy and relieve you of the need to stay on top of rebalancing and allocation changes. Dan, Mark, or Patrick can explain how to set this up if it makes sense for you.

With that, here’s Patrick:

Equity markets continued the upward trend that started in November last year, with most stock indexes posting mid to upper single digit gains for the quarter. The combination of better than anticipated economic data and the continued hope that the Fed will lower interest rates at some point this year added fuel to already overheated equity market prices. Last quarter, I wrote at length about the expensiveness of most US stocks and the effects on future returns. Suffice to say, with the performance of most markets being positive so far this year, our concerns surrounding high valuations have not changed.

The current rally we are witnessing in the S&P 500 has created the following conditions: the price is more than 13% above its 200-day moving average, with more than 85% of members trading about their own 200-day moving average, the Price / Sales ratio (valuation) to the VIX (complacency) at multi-year highs (h/t John Hussman), and household allocations to stocks and their feelings about future prospects at extreme levels. The charts on the right show these conditions going back to 1998. As you can see, this does not always signal a market correction, but it has been a precursor to some of the larger drawdowns we have seen over the last 25 years.

So, if there is one word I could use to describe the environment in the short term it would be “Exhausted.” One silver lining during the quarter is that participation improved in February and March, meaning that the market was not being driven by just a small group of stocks, as we witnessed over much of 2023. It is too early to tell if this is a change in trend, but it would be a much healthier environment in which to take more risk if participation wasn’t as ragged, even when considering current high valuations.

The current trend in inflation data being released might make even three cuts overly optimistic. The trend in CPI, Core PCE (Personal Consumption), and the prices paid component of the ISM manufacturing survey, all point to inflation being stickier and more permanent than what the market was anticipating starting the year.

If inflation does become more embedded in the economy, the effects would be widespread across capital markets. Operating margins for the S&P 500 have maintained a high level, despite higher inflation, on the belief that inflation would moderate, and input costs and end prices would come back down. Inflation remaining sticky is going to test companies’ ability to continue to suppress wages and push higher prices down to the consumer. If the consumer is unable or unwilling to absorb continuously higher prices, margins will compress to more normal levels.

Our job is to navigate this challenging environment and build portfolios that protect against the risks we observe, while earning a return to meet long term goals. To help protect our portfolios against margin compression and inflation risk, our analysis of companies looks at the ability of a company to maintain pricing power and the ability to adjust cost structures based on changing market dynamics.
​
We also run scenario analysis on the operating performance of a company to make sure the price we are paying has a wide margin of safety built in. When looking at other asset classes to complement the portfolio companies we own, our understanding of market history and valuations provides the framework to take advantage of opportunities and avoid unnecessary risks when prices do not reflect economic reality. I look forward to the day when we talk about the breadth of opportunities and how the cash positions in the portfolio are being deployed to take advantage of them. In the meantime, we continue to have a neutral stance, and hold more cash than normal due to high valuations, euphoric sentiment, and ragged market participation. When the data changes, we will change our mind. Thank you for your continued trust and please do not hesitate to reach out to me to discuss any topic in greater detail. —Patrick Mason

Thanks, Patrick!

Have a safe and happy spring!

Tim Mosier, President
​Cairn Investment Group, Inc.

Greetings from the Northwest!

As we welcome the new year, let’s briefly consider how exceptional 2023 has been. Thanks to strong El Niño conditions in the Pacific, the drought in California has been quenched, Washington has a state new record Mahimahi (a tropical fish often associated with Hawaii), and at this point no snow so far in the western Oregon or Washington valleys. It’s been warm and wet. 

Things were equally warm with securities markets, leaving many well-known economists, fund managers, and writers trying to dissect exactly why the year ended so much better than most predicted. Remember that the bank crisis (yes, that was in 2023), rapidly rising rates, high security valuations, inflation, global tensions, and a slowing world economy would combine to pummel stock prices? It didn’t happen; instead, we finished a year that provided solid gains in many asset classes. Some of the showy numbers, like the NASDAQ’s 54% gain, or the S&P’s 26%, were somewhat deceptive, in that they were driven to a huge extent by a very small number of headline stocks, and the NASDAQ’s eye-popping gains came on the heels of an equally bad selloff in 2022, so it’s pretty much where it was two years ago.

Can it continue? Sure, but many of the concerns about overvaluation, a slowing economy, higher rates, etc., are still valid, even more so now. Much of this stock price enthusiasm was encouraged by the belief that the Fed will begin easing rates soon. They may not. I don’t think they should. The Fed has managed to take us from zero rates to something more in line with historical averages, and in so doing regained a useful tool to help us through times of crisis. We are not in crisis and haven’t been for a couple of years, yet governments at all levels have been spending like the end was nigh: another possible cause of the flourishing markets, and something that is unlikely to continue. The world’s supply chains are mostly back up to speed and shouldn’t be a significant driver of inflation going forward. When the seemingly endless flow of unfunded government payouts and backdoor bailouts ends, things are likely to become more challenging for consumers and smaller businesses. I look forward to Patrick’s more nuanced take on some of these topics.  

Here at home, we were honored by a long-time client and his daughter, to be presented with a digital rendition of a cairn photo that we now have hanging in our Vancouver office. Sarah Haftorson is the amazing, upcoming, digital artist who created the picture you see below. You can find out more about her and the process she employs at sarahhaftorson.com.

The 4th quarter of the year topped off a solid 2023 for broader equity markets with the S&P 500 rising over 11% for the quarter and over 26% for the year. Small Cap and International stocks also returned a respectable 16% and 18%, respectively. Bonds started the year poorly, with interest rates continuing to rise for the majority of the year, but the drop in rates that took place in the final two months saw their return move into positive territory at 5.5%. Up until the end of October, equity market performance could be characterized by the “Magnificent 7 (Apple, Microsoft, Meta, Alphabet, Tesla, Nvidia, and Amazon)” and then everyone else. The chart on the right shows the performance of the Mag 7 versus other broad indices. We have talked a lot about the lack of participation during this bear market rally that started at the end of 2022 and how unhealthy such an environment is for markets. So, if there is one silver lining to the recent rally that started on 10.27.23, it is that it has been very broad across numerous asset classes and sectors. The reason I say “one silver lining” is that the recent exuberance in equities is being driven mostly by investors’ hope that the Fed will return to a time of extremely low interest rates and that the inflation war has been won. That exuberance is not driven by drastically improving fundamentals. When you look at the data, the S&P 500 rose 16.21% from 10.27.23-12.31.23, while the S&P 500’s Price / Sales valuation multiple rose 20.19%. Euphoria is indeed alive and well, thanks to the Fed signaling a pivot in monetary policy.

To end the year, the futures market is pricing in almost seven rate cuts in 2024. As you can see in the chart below, there are only eight Fed meetings during the year, so the market is assuming one rate cut starting in March and for every meeting that follows during a time when Core CPI is double the Fed’s long term 2.0% target. Not to say that cannot happen, but equity markets had better be careful what they wish for. If the Fed is cutting rates seven times in 2024, then my bet is that something alarming happened in the economy, causing the need to stimulate growth, which would not be a good thing for equity markets. This makes the biggest risks heading into this year – outside of extremely high valuations (touched on next) – that interest rates and inflation will stay HIGHER than the market is anticipating.

During times of excitement and euphoria, investors tend to forget that valuations and the price you pay for the value of an investment are the main determiners of your long-term return, not the story being pitched at the time. We wrote about Cisco Systems last quarter, as many investors remember the Tech Wreck in the late 90’s, but this type of behavior has been happening for decades. In the 1970’s a story was being told about the Nifty Fifty stocks that is quite like the story being told about the Mag 7 now. It didn’t matter what price you paid for these darlings because they were innovators and would be around for many years to come. IBM is a perfect example of the narrative being presented. Yes, IBM was changing the computing world with growth rates that would match their innovation and impact on technology. In fact, IBM’s revenues grew from $6.88 billion in 1968 to over $34 billion in 1982 (close to 500%). In 1968 Business Week wrote about the exciting growth of IBM and how it compared to other companies:

From the start of 1968, shareholders were rewarded with a price decline over 5% during the coming fourteen-year period, right in line with the S&P 500. Whether it is a company or an asset class, negative returns can be realized over a long-term investment horizon if you pay too dear a price.As Mark Twain is said to have opined, “History doesn’t repeat itself, but it often rhymes.”

Currently, equity valuations are high, with the S&P 500 index price-to-revenue multiple higher than at any point in history outside of late 2021 and 70% above its long-term median.

With high valuations and euphoric expectations about future growth and interest rates, risk of loss is higher than normal. A disciplined investment process with a focus on risk management will be paramount in navigating the years ahead.
​
This is not to say there are not opportunities. Today, we still own high-quality companies that are trading at reasonable valuations; we combine those investments with asset classes we feel offer attractive valuations over the intermediate term. Fixed income is much more compelling than it was a few years ago, but we are still holding most of our allocation in short maturity debt based on the risks we discussed above. We also hold a large portion of the portfolio in cash via money markets, since the interest rate is high and it provides us with the optionality to invest in other long-term investments when prices are attractive. Our conservative positioning will not last forever. Market environments will change, and we will be ready to deploy our higher cash balances when valuations are lower or euphoria in the market has dissipated. Thank you for your continued trust and please do not hesitate to contact me directly if you have any questions or want to discuss any topics in more detail. —Patrick Mason

​Thanks, Patrick. As always, we’re open to discussing any and all of these topics, and would enjoy having you in the office to discuss your investments and plans. The coffee is always hot and free.

Happy Trails,

Tim Mosier, President
​Cairn Investment Group, Inc.

Greetings from the Northwest!

How quickly things get back to normal; the weather, I mean, not the economy. As I begin writing this it’s a blustery and wet fall day that serves to remind me that all things, good or bad, must eventually come to an end. Of interest to us all is where our economy is headed, something that will be determined by our collective adaptations to the higher interest rates and just how badly the embedded cost increases of the past years will affect the spending power of the middle class. 

While employment seems to be hanging on, many effects of the higher rates are just now being felt and are already sending out warning signals. Credit card delinquencies and defaults have risen to levels not seen since the “Great Recession,” and that can only be interpreted as a sign of consumer stress. If employment weakens, expect things to get even worse. Much of this stress is the result of the sticky inflation that has already happened. According to Mark Zandi, Chief Economist at Moody’s Analytics: “To be sure, the high inflation of the past 2+ years has done lots of economic damage. Due to the high inflation, the typical household spent $202 more in a July than they did a year ago to buy the same goods and services. And they spent $709 more than they did 2 years ago.” As employers are forced to increase wages, it’s likely that earnings will suffer.
​
Another effect of the higher rates, not well understood by the general public, is the relationship between interest rates and growth expectations of stocks. Patrick has hit on this in the past, and it’s now being manifested in the price of the high growth stocks that drive the Nasdaq. I’ll leave it to Patrick to take a deeper dive into some of these topics.

​Let’s see what Patrick has to say:

The third quarter saw the return of volatility across capital markets, with most asset classes posting negative returns. Large cap stocks, measured by the S&P 500, were down 3.7%, with bonds not fairing much better, falling 1.99%. The first half of the year, investor enthusiasm was rivaling periods we saw during market highs of 2021, as pundits pushed the narrative that inflation was being controlled and the Fed could soon start cutting interest rates. Growth and big cap tech stocks were the biggest beneficiaries of this, since the artificial intelligence (AI) story has become a popular investment theme. The excitement surrounding AI is reminiscent of the 1999-2000 time frame when any company attached to the internet was being awarded a very lofty multiple. I have written about the disconnect between a good story and a good investment, most recently in March of 2021. As with any good story, there are some partial truths that make the excitement surrounding the growth in a new technology sound compelling, which then awards select companies lofty valuations. In 1999, the partial truth and narrative focused on how impactful and beneficial the internet would be to society, and to company profits. Companies like Cisco were set to profit greatly from the internet’s increasing importance since they developed networking hardware and software. In fact, from fiscal years 1999-2001, Cisco’s revenue grew at a very impressive 83%. Now, one might think that the high growth in revenue would have equated to a soaring stock price to match that growth. In truth, during that same period, Cisco’s stock went on to lose over 80% of its value as even the company’s high growth rate could not match the even higher expectations that investors had placed on the company. Witnessing investors bid up a company like Nvidia to over 30x revenues shows that investors have very short memories about market history and the effects that high valuations can have on future returns. In fact, looking at Cisco’s share price movement during the last 10 months of 1999 is very similar to what we have seen with the share price of Nvidia over the previous 10 months.

This is not a prediction of what is going to happen with the share price of Nvidia. They could very well grow into the high valuation the market has placed on them. However, a good company or story does not always equal a good investment, as Cisco and many other wonderful technology companies showed investors during the tech bubble.

The last three months have seen investor sentiment shift from euphoric levels to a more cautious outlook for capital markets. The primary drivers of the market’s performance over the last three months have been the bond market and monetary policy. Market participants are coming to the realization that interest rates are more than likely to remain higher for a prolonged period, which can affect many different asset classes and investments. The chart below shows as recently as May 3rd, futures markets were pricing in rate cuts for the September Fed meeting that just took place, with rate cuts continuing until the Fed Funds rate was at 4.25% in January.

Fast forward to September 21st: the futures market is now pricing in an additional rate hike this year with rate cuts not taking place until June of 2024.

This has also corresponded with the rate on the 10-year treasury jumping to 4.49%, a level not seen since 2007 before the financial crisis.

What I find interesting about the positive performance in stocks for this year is that many pundits were justifying rising stock prices on the belief that the Fed will change course and start to cut interest rates during the year. With the market now anticipating higher interest rates for longer, and rates might not be lowered until the middle of next year, the types of equities and bonds that will generate attractive risk adjusted returns could shift.

The effects of higher interest rates on fixed income instruments, all things being equal, is straightforward. As interest rates rise, the value of a bond goes down to compensate for the new higher level of interest rates. To combat that interest rate risk in fixed income portfolios, we focus on short maturity, high quality bonds which exhibit less price movement during rising interest rate environments.

The effects on equities are not as intuitive. In our March 2021 letter, I wrote about how different companies can be affected by higher inflation which generally leads to higher interest rates:

If inflationary pressures and concerns become a reality, the tool kit used over that last cycle (investing in high revenue growth, low current earnings U.S. companies, combined with long dated bonds), will not have the same level of success that investors have become accustomed to. The bullet points below explain the intuition:
​

• High revenue / low earnings = earnings are realized further in the future (think of Tesla)
• High inflation = earnings realized in the future are worth a lot less today
• Earnings worth less today = lower share price and price-to-earnings ratio to compensate for lower real value of future earnings (higher inflation)

One could almost replace the word inflation with interest rates, and come to the same conclusion, so the bullet points above hold up well during the environment we find ourselves in now – of high interest rates and sticky inflation – for the simple reason of how to value a future stream of earnings. So, the one bullet point I would add now is:
​

• All things being equal, the HIGHER the discount rate used to value a stream of earnings, the LOWER a company should be worth, leading to lower multiples investors are willing to pay for earnings.

Our approach has always been to buy companies and asset classes that are being offered at a low valuation, which helps combat the risk that higher interest rates can have on the present value of a company. Most equity markets remain quite expensive historically, so building a portfolio that can weather higher interest rates and valuation risk is paramount to being successful in the years ahead. The benefit of managing risk in the current environment, versus environments during the last 16 years, is that cash rates remain high. This allows us to earn a competitive return in money markets and treasury bills while we patiently wait for a more compelling investment environment that properly compensates investors for taking an elevated level of equity risk. As always, we will change our outlook and positioning, based on what the data and facts tell us. Thank you for your continued trust and support, and please don’t hesitate to reach out to me with any questions.

—Patrick Mason

Hoping everyone is well, and that this new season brings new and exciting adventures.

​Tim Mosier, President,
Cairn Investment Group, Inc.

Passed in December 2019, the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement (SECURE) Act included several provisions designed to address a wide variety of retirement planning topics. Considered one of the most comprehensive pieces of legislation affecting retirement savings, it contained several reforms designed to make saving for retirement simpler and more accessible for everyone.
​
The SECURE 2.0 Act was signed into law in late 2022, bringing several additional changes related to retirement and savings not included in the original legislation. These changes, too, were aimed at encouraging more workers to save for retirement. While not a comprehensive list, below are the takeaways we feel are the most noteworthy.

To comply with IRS mandated tax rules, a required minimum distribution – often referred to as a “RMD” – is the amount that must be withdrawn from a qualified retirement account or IRA each year. The SECURE 2.0 Act raised the RMD age to 73, starting in 2023 and to 75, starting in 2033. Previously, the penalty for failing to satisfy the minimum distribution was 50% of the amount not taken. That penalty is now reduced down to 25%, and further to 10% if corrected within two years.
​
Roth 401(k)’s, unlike Roth IRA’s, are currently subject to the same RMD rules as traditional qualified retirement accounts. However, beginning in 2024, Roth 401(k)’s will no longer have minimum distribution requirements.

Currently, individuals who have reached age 50 or older are permitted to make catch-up contributions into their employer sponsored retirement plan. The catch-up limit for 2023 is $7,500 and is indexed annually for inflation. Traditionally, plans offered the option to designate these contributions as pre-tax and/or after-tax Roth. Under SECURE 2.0, for participants with income over $145,000, all catch-up contributions need to be made to after-tax Roth accounts starting in 2024.
​
Additionally, beginning in 2025, the catch-up contribution limit for those aged 60-63 will increase to the greater of (1) $10,000 or (2) 150% of the standard catch-up contribution limit.

It’s not uncommon for investors with 529 plans to have account balances remaining even after college expenses are paid in full. Under current law, a withdrawal for anything other than qualified education expenses may be subject to ordinary income tax and a 10% penalty.
​
SECURE 2.0 changed the rules surrounding 529 plan withdrawals, allowing owners to roll over excess balances from a 529 into a Roth IRA. The following guidelines must be meet for the rollover to be considered valid:

• The 529 plan must have been in existence for a minimum of 15 years.
• The Roth IRA owner must be the same as the 529 plan beneficiary.
• The transfer is subject to a lifetime maximum of $35,000.
• Roth IRA yearly contribution limits still apply.
• Contributions made to the 529 within the last 5 years, including the associated earnings, are not eligible.
• The Roth IRA owner must have compensation at least equal to the amount of the rollover.

With fewer companies offering pension benefits, the responsibility to save for retirement largely falls on individual workers. Those that don’t contribute will find themselves falling behind.
​
Beginning in 2025, all 401(k) and 403(b) plans established on or after December 29th, 2022, will be required to automatically enroll their employees into those plans at a minimum contribution rate of 3%, but not more than 10%. The contributions must increase by 1% each subsequent year until the participant has a contribution rate of at least 10%, but not more than 15%. As an employee, you still have the option of changing your contribution rate or opting out of the plan altogether.

Current law enables employers to initiate mandatory distributions from terminated employee’s retirement plans after a 30-60 day waiting period, without the owner’s consent. If no action is taken, and the balance is between $1,000 - $5,000, the account can be automatically rolled into an IRA. Accounts with less than $1,000 can be paid out by check. SECURE 2.0 permits plan service providers to offer plan “portability”, meaning that account balances, rather than being cashed out, will transfer to the employee’s new retirement plan automatically when they change jobs.

The emergency savings provisions in SECURE 2.0 are designed to make it easier for participants to set aside funds for unforeseen emergency expenses. Beginning in 2024, plans are now eligible to offer non-highly compensated employees the option of establishing an emergency savings account as part of their retirement plan. Contributions will be after-tax and capped at $2,500. Distributions can be taken anytime, and the first four withdrawals must be free from any fees.
​
In addition, employers may also offer a tax – and penalty free emergency withdrawal of up to $1,000 per year. Withdrawals taken under this provision must be repaid within three years.

​Under current rules, an employer is only allowed to match a participant’s pre-tax deferral or after-tax contribution into their retirement plan. SECURE 2.0 allows employers to make matching contributions on behalf of employees making student loan payments, even if they are not contributing anything to the plan. Beginning in 2024, employers are authorized to match those loan repayment amounts.
​
To qualify for the match, the following guidelines must be met:

• Payment must be for “eligible expenses”, according to IRS definitions.
• Loan payment must be for a “qualified student loan”, according to IRS definitions.
• Loan payment must be for “qualified higher education expenses”. Defined by the IRS as tuition, fees, or other related expenses.
• Loan payment must be for an “eligible student”, defined as someone who is enrolled at least half-time in a program of study leading to a degree, certificate, or other recognized educational credential at an eligible educational institution.

If you have any questions regarding the SECURE 2.0 Act, or what impact it may have on your financial plan, our team of advisors at Cairn Investment Group are available to assist. Contact us anytime for a complimentary consultation.

Greetings from the Northwest!

What a difference 12 weeks makes in the weather! We’ve got a great start to the summer this year, not having to suffer through the typical June downpours before a sudden seasonal shift to dry and hot; we’re already there and my lawn is suffering. Sometimes it’s nice to have simple problems like that. Our friends in California are getting some great weather, too, but still dealing with an immense amount of water leaking out of the mountains. On a recent drive down the back side of the Sierra Nevada, I was delayed several times by flooding over US 395, and those mountains were still covered in snow.

Every quarter I like to give a few thoughts on what I see as big picture issues that escape the casual viewer due to the “forest for the trees” effect, before handing things over to Patrick for his deeper dive into the current market conditions. Frankly, I’m having a tough time finding something to discuss this quarter, mainly because so much has not changed, and you deserve not to read my opinion for the third time on a topic! There are many macro issues in play, yet resolution for most has been slow.

So, instead, I’ll turn inward a bit. First, I’ll remind everyone of our upcoming move. We’ll be out of the current location at the end of the day on July 13, the end of this week, and up and running on Monday, July 17 at our new headquarter location in Vancouver. Meetings that week can be scheduled at either the Vancouver location, or at our branch office in Portland. Remember that the Portland office is available by appointment only.

Another exciting development is that Cairn can now manage your 401K and other employer sponsored retirement plans. If you have a desire for professional management of your retirement assets, let us know and we can discuss how this works and what advantages this may bring to your financial outlook.

Finally, I’ll mention our expanding focus on financial planning. It’s something we’ve always done on demand but was not originally a core feature of our business. Times change and so have we. We have two Certified Financial Planners (CFP®) on staff, and we utilize the most comprehensive planning software available, allowing us to provide accurate and informative projections that reveal the key decisions that you must make as you make your way through life. This service has no additional cost to you, so if you feel like now is the time, let us know.

With that I’ll hand things over to Patrick:​

With all the noise surrounding the economy, interest rates, and inflation, one could be forgiven for thinking that equity markets would be suffering. Instead, the S&P 500 has experienced a stellar first half. We have written at length regarding valuations, and risks facing current equity markets, and our opinion has not changed as nothing in the data has meaningfully shifted. In fact, today’s environment is similar to the one we wrote about a couple years ago when US equity markets were being driven by a few select companies. The two charts below show 6-month return contributions for the S&P 500 going back to 1991, and the year-to-date returns of some broadly followed indexes. Leadership has never been so narrow as it is right now, which is not the hallmark of a healthy market.

The top 10 stocks in the S&P 500 now make up over 30% of the index compared to 17% in 2015. Investors throwing money into this bloated index are making a huge bet that market dynamics are forever changed. Enthusiasm for the most popular stocks is also evident in sentiment indicators, with both the CNN Fear & Greed Index and Sentimentrader’s Smart Money showing extreme optimism.

This type of frothy sentiment has historically been a contrarian indicator when combined with high valuations. Outside of late 2021 and the tech crisis, valuations have never been higher.

The silver lining in this challenging environment is the fact that we are still finding some attractive companies and asset classes that present compelling long-term value. And as the interest rate environment has shifted over the last 15 months, we are able to earn a return on cash while we patiently wait for a more attractive investment environment. Thank you for your continued trust. Please reach out to me if you have any questions or want to discuss any topic in more detail.
​
​—Patrick Mason

Thanks, Patrick! With that, I’ll wish you all a wonderful summer full of family and travel.

​Tim Mosier, President,
Cairn Investment Group, Inc.

Greetings from the Northwest!

I’ve heard that it’s finally Spring. I’d like to see some evidence before I believe it! All of us on the West Coast would welcome a change from the cold and rain. Attempting just that, I recently spent a few days at Disneyland with my granddaughters and rarely have I been so wet, and that’s from the perspective of a Northwesterner. I’m glad to be back in the dry, warm office.

Speaking of the office, Cairn continues to grow! I’m happy to announce that Dan Poe, recently of Ameriprise, has joined us an Investment Advisor in Portland. His bio will be up soon on our website. With Dan, we’ll have four Advisors with the firm, and be better able to serve the diverse needs of our clients. I’m really looking forward to having his help in answering your many questions and making sure that our investment strategy is in sync with your needs. While the world roils around us, we feel that it’s vital to make these investments in people to assure our future.
​
It’s been an interesting first quarter for 2023. While much has changed, like finding out that some big banks weren’t really solvent, much has not changed so much. Fundamentally, we’re still in a time of higher inflation, rising interest rates, and resilient employment. The same political and economic issues are being fought about in Washington. The major market indices are near historic highs, measured as either price or valuation. Since we have little exposure to the banking sector, and none at all to the banks considered at risk, our general outlook and plans remain steady. I’m sure that Patrick will expand on this.

The recent bank implosions are worth discussing briefly, because they caused disruption in the financial markets, and many of you have been concerned about the safety of your money. Banks fail when the FDIC says they fail. Sometimes it seems unfair and too preemptive, but everyone in that game knows the rules. Insufficient liquidity, the inability to meet depositors’ withdrawal needs, is the measuring stick. You can get there by facing too many withdrawals too quickly, or by making poor investment choices. They usually find a way of coinciding. The failed banks all played a part in their own demise by poor investment management relative to their obligations to depositors, and also by being a bit too successful at winning jumbo-sized clients who can demand huge withdrawals in a flash, which they did. The vast majority of banks do not have these issues, and the largest, considered too big to fail, get easy liquidity from the US government as they need it. While 90% of bank deposits are FDIC insured across the country, Silicon Valley Bank operated with about 10% of its deposits insured. So hopefully, on that topic, we can relax a bit and realize it’s just part of the process of burning off excesses from our long bull market.

At the height of the scare, the list of at-risk banks seemed to explode, and even included Schwab for a while. The metrics being cited were very one-dimensional and failed to recognize how well Schwab had consistently met the FDIC’s liquidity requirements, and how many billions of dollars Schwab has in reserve through the totality of its business. The company thought to be somewhat at risk, Schwab Bank, is just part of the overall Charles Schwab & Co., which includes the security broker dealer that custodies your assets. Only your Bank Deposit funds, also known as “sweep” funds, are connected to the Schwab Bank. These are insured up to $250,000 by the FDIC per account beneficiary. Schwab’s typical client has several types of accounts and is focused on overall wealth management much more than on banking. Almost half of these assets are managed by an advisor like Cairn, adding a layer of care and commitment that is unlike a typical bank. There is a nicely written piece on the Schwab website, in case you want to see some greater details on this. If you need to know more about this, just give us a call.

Let’s see what Patrick has to say.

​All the turmoil in the banking sector, to date, has not rattled capital markets, with Large Cap stocks returning 7.50%, small cap 2.74%, international stocks 8.47% and bonds 2.96%. Headlines surrounding what the Fed might or might not do regarding interest rate hikes, combined with cracks materializing across regional banks, made for lots of volatility. At the end of the day, investors’ risk appetites remained strong despite these headwinds. There has been quite a bit written in the financial news about what has unfolded across the regional bank landscape. I won’t bore you with the small details, but the failure of Silicon Valley Bank was a byproduct of the Fed leaving interest rates artificially low for TOO long, not that the Fed started raising interest rates aggressively. Once interest rates, rightfully, started to rise, banks that had taken on too much risk investing in longer dated bonds exposed their balance sheet and solvency to risks most investors didn’t see coming. When deposit rates are close to zero, while T-Bills and money markets yield north of 4%, it can expose risks for banks that had invested customer deposits in long dated bonds.

Technological advances have allowed clients to move cash balances quickly, and at banks that focused their deposit base on large clients with balances above FDIC limits (SVB, First Republic, etc.), a bank run can happen. I applaud the FDIC for how they have handled the situation, to date. Stepping in swiftly and backing all deposits, regardless of FDIC insurance limits, while wiping out equity and debt holders, is how bank failures should work. As Tim mentioned, we have very little exposure to the banking sector, and that is a byproduct of our process and our investment discipline.
​
Over the last couple of years, I have mentioned that although valuations have been elevated for US stocks, one of the silver linings has been broad price participation. This means that returns were not being driven by a narrow list of names like markets witnessed from 2017 to early 2020. The chart below measures the S&P 500 equal weight v. the S&P 500.

​We have seen a steep reversal in market participation this year. The reversal has been so sharp, as this chart from Tavi Costa of Crescast Capital shows, the largest 15 stocks in the S&P 500 have generated 100% of the returns to start the year.

​The rebound in stocks to start the year has done nothing to alleviate the issue of lofty valuations for the S&P 500. Even with the index down close to 8% over the last year, valuations still sit at close to all-time highs. As a reminder, long-term returns, generated by stocks, are comprised of three variables: earnings growth, dividend yield, and change in valuation. To get to the 10% historical average return in US stocks that investors are beaten over the head with, you start with: earnings growth of 6% historically, plus a dividend yield of 2%, which puts you at 8%. To make up the 2% difference, multiple expansion needs to take place. Given that we are already sitting at historically high multiples, that seems to be unlikely. I would argue the path of least resistance is to have multiples contract, meaning that valuations will be a drag on returns for US stocks. It is just math.

​The combination of high valuations, poor market participation, and a market that is still in a downtrend does not strike us as an environment where taking excessive risk will be rewarded. The bright side is that our investment universe is not limited to the S&P 500; and, being value managers, we are always focused on the price we are paying for an investment and whether that provides an adequate margin of safety before putting your capital at risk. We are still finding some attractively valued investments in US stocks, though the opportunities are limited. We find international equities to be more attractive and we look for opportunities to continue to add to that asset class when appropriate. Thank you for your continued trust. Please drop me a line if you want to discuss any topic in greater detail. —Patrick Mason

We are proud to announce that our own Patrick Mason has been selected as a panelist at the 2023 Private Wealth Pacific Northwest Forum being held in Portland on March 8, 2023.

The Private Wealth Pacific Northwest Forum was developed as an education-focused, in person event for allocators and asset managers. The purpose of this meeting is to facilitate the dissemination of actionable investor content, coupled with supporting the continued development of the private wealth investment industry in the Northwest region.
​
Patrick will have the opportunity to present his views on current and future market opportunities and strategies with other professional money managers.

Patrick is responsible for portfolio management, investment and economic analysis at Cairn Investment Group. He also plays a pivotal role in communicating Cairn’s investment philosophy to clients and prospects. His discerning and knowledgeable demeanor hallmarks any encounter with him. Patrick holds a degree in Economics, is a Certified Financial Planner, and a member of the CFA Society of Portland. He previously held portfolio management and financial planning positions with a local investment management firm, Charles Schwab, and TIAA-CREF prior to joining Cairn Investment Group during his investment career that began in 2002.

With the abundance of financial information now accessible online, the interest in Roth conversions has increased substantially in recent years, and for good reason. Roth IRAs are largely considered to be one of the most appealing retirement savings vehicles available. Coupled with declining tax rates and a proliferation of newly retired baby boomers – an estimated 29 million in 2020 – more and more people are left wondering, “Does a Roth conversion make sense for me?”

Roth conversions, unlike contributions, can be done by almost anyone. While the basics of a Roth conversion are understood by many, determining when, if, and how much to convert is often a complicated question to answer. Before deciding if a Roth conversion is right for you, it’s important first to understand the differences between the types of IRAs, the types of conversions, and the pros and cons.

A Roth IRA conversion is the process of moving funds from a traditional, SEP, or Simple IRA – or a defined contribution plan like a 401(k) – into a Roth IRA. Anyone can convert eligible IRA assets to a Roth, regardless of income. Income tax is owed on the conversion in the year you convert. Assuming the contributions you made to the IRA account were deductible, you’ll owe income tax on every dollar. If the contributions were non-deductible, you’ll owe income tax only on your earnings. There’s no requirement on the amount of dollars you can convert each year, you can choose to do partial conversions of any amount. ​

A backdoor Roth conversion is a strategy used by high-income earners to circumvent the income limits that apply to Roth IRA contributions. This strategy is possible because there are no income thresholds limiting who can make non-deductible traditional IRA contributions or Roth conversions. Whether or not you can make the maximum Roth IRA contribution annually depends on your tax filing status and modified adjusted gross income (MAGI). For ’23, as a single filer, you may contribute up to the annual limit if your MAGI is less than $153,000. As a joint filer, your MAGI must be less than $228,000 to contribute the maximum amount allowed. A backdoor Roth conversion is a process whereby you establish a traditional IRA account (or contribute to an existing account), make a non-deductible contribution, and then convert it to a Roth. Calculating the taxes on a back door conversion is further complicated by the pro-rata taxation rules. The pro-rata rule influences the taxation, calculating liability proportionally to the fraction of after-tax vs. before-tax contributions. Let’s look at two examples to help demonstrate the difference between these two circumstances.
​
Example 1: Paul earns over $228,000 per year as a joint filer, participates in his employers 401(k), and would like to make a Roth IRA contribution. Because his income is over the threshold, he cannot make a direct contribution. As an alternative he opens a Traditional IRA, makes a non-deductible contribution, and then converts those funds into a Roth IRA. Because his contribution was after-tax and non-deductible – and because he does not have other pre-tax IRA accounts – no taxes are due on the principal amount converted. Any earnings on the deposit would be subject to income tax at the time of conversion. If this is done is succession, earnings will be negligible.  

Example 2 (pro-rate rule): Paul earns over $228,000 per year as a joint filer, participates in his employers 401(k), and would like to make a Roth IRA contribution but has a Traditional IRA that was funded with strictly deductible/pre-tax contributions. Again, because his income is over the threshold, he cannot make a direct contribution. He can, however, contribute to his existing Traditional IRA and then convert those funds to a Roth IRA. The tax consequences of this transaction will be much different because of the pro rata rule. The pro rata rule prevents you from converting only the after-tax funds, it must be proportionate to the fraction of pre vs. post tax contributions.

Let’s say Paul has a $100,000 Traditional IRA balance, $7,500 of which came from a non-deductible contribution (’23 maximum allowed for those over 50). If Paul chooses to convert the $7,500 contribution, he will need to calculate how much of the conversion will be subject to taxes; the steps are as follows:

• $7,500 non-deductible amount/$100,000 total IRA balance = 0.075 non-taxable percentage
• $7,500 amount to be converted x 0.075 non-taxable percentage = $562.50 non-taxable amount 
• $7,500 amount to be converted – $562.50 non-taxable amount = $6,937.50 amount of conversion subject to tax 

If you have met the five-year rule and are at least age 59 ½, Roth IRA withdrawals are completely tax-free. Tax-free withdrawals offer tremendous advantages in retirement, particularly in years when you have higher than normal income or want to realize capital gains without triggering additional tax liabilities.

Unlike traditional IRAs, 401(k)’s etc., Roth IRAs do not have distribution requirements beginning at age 72. You can continue letting the funds grow tax-free for as long as you’d like. Minimum distributions can increase your income significantly later in life, especially when considering other means tested benefits, such as Medicare premiums and social security. The ability to leave Roth funds intact, without a withdrawal requirement, is a major advantage over other retirement vehicles. ​

Paul, who is retired, has total taxable income of $89,450 filing jointly (after adjusting for deductions), putting him at the tail end of the 12% marginal income tax bracket. Any additional income he realizes this year, will put him in the 22% marginal income bracket. He has done a very good job of saving for retirement, but never contributed or converted funds to a Roth IRA. All of his retirement savings accumulated in 401(k) and traditional IRA accounts. Let’s say, for example, that Paul booked a vacation to spend some time with his family in Hawaii, at a total cost of $10,000. When he withdraws funds from the IRA to pay for the trip, he’ll pay tax on that distribution at a rate of 22%, nearly a 50% increase from his previous bracket. Because his only source of funds is IRA and 401(k) assets, he has no other option. 

If he had Roth IRA and/or non-qualified taxable assets to withdraw from, he would have much more control over his tax liability. The option of pulling assets from those account types could have saved him $2,200 in additional federal income taxes ($10,000 * 22%). Maintaining a Roth IRA account in retirement can help prevent a situation like this. 

Roth IRAs are a particularly valuable estate planning tool. When inheriting a Roth, you are granted the same tax advantages as the original owner. Distributions are tax free, provided it’s been 5 years since the original account owner established the account (each conversion has its own 5-year requirement). The SECURE Act, which was passed in December 2019, changed the inherited IRA distribution rules. For those deaths that occurred in ’20 or later, non-spouse beneficiaries must establish an inherited Roth IRA account and withdraw the entire balance within a 10-year period or take a lump sum distribution. 

The new law also created a category of beneficiaries called “eligible designated beneficiaries”, who are still permitted to stretch distributions over their life expectancy. As a non-spouse beneficiary, you must fall into one the of the following categories to qualify; (1) a minor child of the decedent (only applicable until the minor reaches the age of majority) (2) disabled persons (3) chronically ill (4) not more than 10 years younger than the deceased and (5) certain types of trusts. 

​Spousal beneficiaries can treat the account as their own, stretch distributions over their lifetime, deplete the account over a 10-year period or take a lump sum distribution.

Any amount you choose to convert will increase your ordinary income, which may push you into a higher marginal tax bracket. Conversions only make sense if the converted funds are taxed at a rate that is lower than what you expect to pay in the future. Without proper planning, it’s possible to pay more lifetime taxes with a Roth conversion than without. 

Many things can prompt your desire to reverse a conversion. Two of the more common reasons for doing so are: (1) poor investment performance and (2) underestimating your tax liability and/or marginal bracket. 

Remember, the amount you convert from an IRA to a Roth IRA, under most circumstances, is fully taxable. If you perform a conversion and subsequently loose money on the investments, you may want to reverse that transaction, in hopes of reconverting when the account has a lower balance to reduce the overall tax liability. 

Alternatively, you may underestimate your tax liability when planning for a conversion. Let’s say for example you convert $30,000 in October and then receive an unexpected bonus in December, pushing you into a higher marginal income tax bracket prior to year-end. Your total anticipated income, after receiving the bonus, may cause you to reconsider the prior conversion. Prior to 2018, you could have “recharacterized” the conversion, meaning you could move the converted funds back to the traditional IRA, eliminating taxes that would have otherwise been owed. Under current law, Roth conversions are irreversible. Once your conversion is complete, nothing can be done to reverse it.

It’s important to understand the interrelationship that exists between ordinary income, capital gains, social security and other taxes and surcharges; including net investment income tax and Medicare premium surcharges. Long-term capital gains stack on top of ordinary income, so an increase in ordinary income can trigger additional capital gains taxes. Ordinary income also plays a factor when calculating “provisional income,” which is used to determine how much, if any, of your social security benefit will be subject to tax. Lastly, more ordinary income can trigger Medicare premium surcharges and/or net investment income tax.

Beginning in ’07, government began reducing the subsidy for high-income individuals, causing them to pay higher monthly amounts for Part B and Part D Medicare premiums. These surcharges are referred to as “Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amounts,” or IRMAA, which is determined by income on your tax return from two years prior. See the chart below for a breakdown of these surcharges based on income:

Net investment income tax is a 3.8% surtax paid in addition to regular income taxes. The surtax applies only if you have net investment income – capital gains and dividends, interest and annuity payments, passive business income and/or rents – and MAGI over a certain amount; $200,000 filing single and $250,000 filing jointly. The surtax applies to your net investment income or the portion of your MAGI that excess the threshold – whichever is less. For example, if you have $40,000 in net investment income and your MAGI goes over the threshold by $60,000, you’ll owe the 3.8% surtax. But you’ll owe only on the $40,000 since it’s the lower of the two amounts. Total tax would be $1,520 ($40,000 x 3.8%).

The rules and tax implications of converting any amount from a traditional IRA to a Roth IRA – or as a backdoor or mega backdoor conversion – are very complex. We strongly recommend you consult with a tax advisor and/or financial planning professional to help properly determine if a conversion is right for you before executing any of the strategies discussed herein. 
​
The decision to convert to a Roth should be made in the context of a comprehensive financial plan. If you have additional questions or would like to explore any of these strategies further, our team of advisors at Cairn Investment Group are available to assist. Contact us anytime for a complimentary consultation.